Many industries rely on optimum security measures to protect their assets, including everything from banking offices to retail centers. Often companies depend on outdated security equipment that falls short of their expectations. However, management typically questions the cost of integrating video surveillance and access control systems. Consider the factors influencing the cost of this crucial decision when evaluating ways to improve security protocols.
Overcoming Initial Challenges
Achieving increased building security means overcoming initial challenges to making this critical transition. For example, installation costs for businesses without existing security equipment are easier to estimate than those requiring integration with current systems. For example, a place where video and access control systems are separately installed may lead to more complex and expensive considerations. In addition, unifying the solution depends on the current security system’s age and technical features.
Physical Security Information Management (PSIM)
A physical security information management (PSIM) system is often the costliest security solution to bring multiple systems together. This option requires continued investment to support and maintenance for system integrations to function correctly when upgraded systems are upgraded. Additionally, custom development is involved in creating a layer over integrated systems. Therefore, many companies preferring complete customization consider this system.
Integration or Interfacing Systems
Another possibility is integration or interfacing system that requires basic development work using software kits. This is an affordable option because of its limited functionality to basic capabilities, such as linking control events to video. However, this choice might not be the best for industries requiring the highest level of security and reliability. Plus, operations may work from various interfaces, leading to increased training expenses, incompatibilities, and system failures.
Unification
The third option for building security is unification, which is the more affordable choice because a single platform and vendor provide video surveillance and access control systems. As a result, upgrades, configurations, maintenance, and training are streamlined through automation. Additionally, security features enable customization within an established budget to achieve security goals without exceeding limitations.
Cost of Operating Separate Systems
For companies reluctant to make initial investments, management must calculate the cost of operating separate systems and dealing with inefficiencies. The integration provides the highest level of accuracy and efficiency to improve security protocols. For example, failure to capture video of a security breach could result in severe losses. Then coupled with the continued expenses of training, integration, and maintenance, it’s easy to see why transitioning is cost-effective.
Opt for Efficiency
Regarding maintaining security, efficiency is a top priority to protect assets and people. An integrated system with customization options empowers the security team to capture essential information to keep the premises safe. A security failure can lead to costly losses, damages, and injuries. Fortunately, some of the most reliable security solutions include seamless integration, maintenance, and training.
Keeping a building secure depends on investing in the right security system. While budget is a concern, the security solution should also be reliable, accurate, and easy to use. Consult with a security professional today to learn about the various options to maintain the highest level of security at any facility.
